Case Management Plan: Provide a summary of the JAR tool describing what it measures.

Using the same case you chose for Assignment 1, develop a case management plan, in which you develop an evidence-based response addressing the risks you identified in your case formulation. Please use the proforma provided in the assignment folder, and ensure you review the marking criteria. Index offence: list the offender’s current charges / convictions, again copying directly from Assignment 1. Make any corrections as per feedback provided from Assignment 1. 4. Provide a brief history of offending behaviour (you do not need to include details around the offending as you did for the index offence). 5. Psychometric testing: ii. Ms Smith Education completion: year 10 or more Employment: Held a job for less than 2 years Accommodation: Has stable, unsafe accommodation b. Provide a summary of the JAR tool describing what it measures. You may use the following to give you an idea of how to write this section: “The Violence Risk Scale (VRS) is a comprehensive actuarial instrument that covers the majority of the best-established predictors of violence. Actuarial instruments involve a mechanical combination of risk factors that place an individual offender into a risk category that can be compared to that of the average violent offender. Research indicates that the intensity of risk management efforts should be matched to this relative level of risk. The VRS includes both static (historical) and dynamic (changeable) risk factors. As such, it acknowledges the fluctuating nature of risk and the dynamic factors can also serve as intervention and management targets. The VRS has been validated in correctional samples and total scores on the instrument have been found to have a moderate-to-high relationship with subsequent violence Provide the offender’s JAR score, and a brief explanation of the offender’s score. d. Discuss what the offender’s score means in the theoretical context of RNR, using references to support your discussion of RNR. For example, if the offender’s score was moderate, you might comment on the fact that a moderate score indicates a moderate level of risk of re-offending (Risk) and that such offenders need a moderate level of intervention (Need). For JAR and the Responsivity principle, you would need to consider information from the case (eg, cognitive limitations) and how they might impact on the offender’s capacity to engage in treatment. (Note: you will need to expand a little on this and include references; for example, you could define what each of the principles mean – and obviously, you would only need to do that once). Move on to the Assessment of Treatment Readiness (ART) tool (scroll down the proforma to find it). Add the scores for each category, and noting whether they fall into the low or medium-high category: Attitudes and Motivation: <20 is low 20+ is Medium-High Emotional Reactions: <20 is low 20+ is Medium-High Offending Beliefs: <13 is low 13+ is Medium-High Efficacy: <13 is low 13+ is Medium-High Overall Score: <72 is low 72+ is Medium-High f. Provide a brief explanation of the tool (something like this: “The ART is a 20-item questionnaire (with a 5-point Likert scale), which is utilised to assess how a client personally feels about rehabilitation programs, etc, etc. The offender’s scores on the ART indicate the following:” Provide a summary of the offenders scores for each category, and provide a brief explanation of what the score means (see slides from Tutorial 7 for examples of dialogue that you can use). h. Discuss the offender’s scores in the theoretical context of RNR, focusing particularly on need and responsivity in the context of treatment readiness / motivation to change. You may wish to discuss risk and need in the context of specific answers (eg, “I hate being told what to do”), but you are not required to do so. Don’t forget to include references. 6. Summarise risk factors / treatment targets. You may draw much of this from your case formulation along with anything that has stood out for you on the JAR or ART. If you are using information from your case formulation, please be sure to include any corrective feedback you may have received. Also, please ensure you name (not just describe) the factors. 7. Develop two Risk scenarios based on the risk and treatment factors you have previously identified. The first should be based on the offender’s already existing patterns of offending. So essentially, ask yourself, “If the offender was to reoffend, what would they do, and what would trigger them doing so?” Use your knowledge of their prior offending to develop that first scenario. b. The second scenario should be either and escalation of existing patterns (eg, starting to use a weapon in assaults instead of fists) or a twist (eg, targeting a new victim type). c. If you’re really keen, you can do a third scenario, but it is not required. You can earn an HD with two well-considered scenarios.

Click here to request for this assignment help

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: photography charlottesville va | Thanks to ppc software, penny auction and larry goins