Use refences attached plus additional

Use the global social problem you selected in the first topic (Gender Violence). In an essay of 750-1,000 words, please address the following prompts. Include proper citations (books, government websites, journals, etc.) to support your responses:

  1. Analyze the prevalence of your chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States.
  2. Analyze the prevalence of your chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in other countries.
  3. What factors have been cited as general causes of your chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States and other countries?
  4. Recommend specific strategies that could be implemented to alleviate your chosen global social problem through the lens of race and ethnicity.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Collapse All Global Analysis By Race And Ethnicity Essay – Rubric Collapse All

Intersection with the US

20 points

Criteria Description

Analysis of the prevalence of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States

5. Target

20 points

Analysis of the prevalence of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States is thorough, with strong evidence to support claims.

4. Acceptable

17.4 points

Analysis of the prevalence of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence to support claims.

3. Approaching

15.8 points

Analysis of the prevalence of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States is limited. Lacks some evidence to support claims.

2. Insufficient

14.8 points

Analysis of the prevalence of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States is limited, weak, and missing evidence to support claims.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Analysis of the prevalence of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States is not included.

Intersect with Other Countries

20 points

Criteria Description

Analysis of of the prevalence of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in other countries.

5. Target

20 points

Analysis of of the prevalence of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in other countries is thorough, with relevant evidence to support claims.

4. Acceptable

17.4 points

Analysis of of the prevalence of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in other countries is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence to support claims.

3. Approaching

15.8 points

Analysis of of the prevalence of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in other countries is limited. Lacks some evidence to support claims.

2. Insufficient

14.8 points

Analysis of of the prevalence of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in other countries is limited, weak, and missing evidence to support claims.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Analysis of of the prevalence of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in other countries is not included.

Factors

15 points

Criteria Description

Factors that have been cited as general causes of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States and other countries

5. Target

15 points

Factors that have been cited as general causes of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States and other countries are expertly detailed and supported with strong sources to support claims.

4. Acceptable

13.05 points

Factors that have been cited as general causes of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States and other countries are presented in an insightful manner. Description is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence to support claims.

3. Approaching

11.85 points

Factors that have been cited as general causes of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States and other countries are presented in a somewhat limited manner. Description lacks some evidence to support claims.

2. Insufficient

11.1 points

Factors that have been cited as general causes of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States and other countries are vague, limited, and weak. Lacks evidence to support claims.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Factors that have been cited as general causes of the chosen global social problem as it intersects with race and ethnicity in the United States and other countries are not included.

Response or Result

15 points

Criteria Description

Recommendations for specific strategies that could be implemented to alleviate the chosen global social problem through the lens of race and ethnicity

5. Target

15 points

Recommendations for specific strategies that could be implemented to alleviate the chosen global social problem through the lens of race and ethnicity are comprehensive, with strong evidence to support claims.

4. Acceptable

13.05 points

Recommendations for specific strategies that could be implemented to alleviate the chosen global social problem through the lens of race and ethnicity are thorough, with sound analysis and appropriate evidence to support claims.

3. Approaching

11.85 points

Recommendations for specific strategies that could be implemented to alleviate the chosen global social problem through the lens of race and ethnicity are somewhat limited and lacks some evidence to support claims.

2. Insufficient

11.1 points

Recommendations for specific strategies that could be implemented to alleviate the chosen global social problem through the lens of race and ethnicity are limited, weak, and missing evidence to support claims.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Recommendations for specific strategies that could be implemented to alleviate the chosen global social problem through the lens of race and ethnicity are not included.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

7 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target

7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable

6.09 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

3. Approaching

5.53 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

2. Insufficient

5.18 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

8 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

5. Target

8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching

6.32 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient

5.92 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

Evidence

5 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

5. Target

5 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

4. Acceptable

4.35 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

3. Approaching

3.95 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2. Insufficient

3.7 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

Mechanics of Writing

5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

4.35 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

3.95 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient

3.7 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Format/Documentation

5 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target

5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable

4.35 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching

3.95 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient

3.7 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 100 points

 Welcome to one of the bestassignmenthelpcompanies  online .

·         Do you want to order for a customized assignment help task?

·          Click on the order now button 

·         Set up your topic, Fix the number of pages, Fix your Order instructions 

·         Set up your deadline, upload the necessary files required to complete the task, Complete the payment.

 We delivery high quality and non plagiarized tasks within the stipulated time given 

SL