. Explain why first-person thoughts pose a problem for Frege’s account of meaning. Does his solution to this problem threaten the objectivity of meaning? If so why? If not, why not?


  How does Frege explain how an identity-statement can be both true and informative?


 What is the correct analysis of a sentence like ‘The present King of France is bald.’ according to Russell?


 Explain the difference between Russell’s and Strawson’s accounts of the logical relation between ‘The present King of France is bald.’ and ‘There is a King of France.’