The assignment concentrates on Evaluating a Web source. Also, there is an analysis of credibility, comprehensiveness, and relevancy. So, incorporate some of its claims and/or evidence into your own argument.

Evaluating a Web source – credibility, comprehensiveness, and relevancy Analysis

Description I’ve also attached an example of a paper that had gotten an A and the web source I used was “Most Teachers ‘Highly Qualified’ Under NCLB Standards, But Teacher Qualifications Lag in Many High Poverty and High Minority Schools.” American Institutes for Research, 18 Apr. 2017, www.air.org/news/pressrelease/most-teachers-highly-qualified-under-nclb-standards-teacher-qualifications-lag. Assignment: Write a 4-page minimum paper evaluating a Web source related to the problem you are researching⎯one that is either worth using in your essays or that has limited usefulness for your work this semester.

Evaluating a Web source – credibility, comprehensiveness, and relevancy Analysis

Summarize this source and then provide a detailed evaluation of its credibility, comprehensiveness, and relevancy. Directions: Your source evaluation should include the following: 1. an introductory paragraph using the 5Ws for the text (i.e. who is the author and its intended audience, what is the title and genre of the source, when and where it published, and why it written?). The introductory paragraph should also include an arguable thesis statement evaluating the text’s credibility and usefulness for your research paper. 2. a paragraph summarizing the main argument of the text and the primary evidence used to support this argument. 3. at least one paragraph evaluating the author’s credibility, bias, and objectivity.

Evaluating a Web source – credibility, comprehensiveness, and relevancy Analysis

You will need to do some research about the author to write this section. 4. at least one paragraph evaluating the source’s credibility, including its accuracy, coverage of the issue/topic, type and amount of evidence, research methods, and use of reliable sources. 5. a discussion of another source that might be able to corroborate (i.e. back up) this text, or provide alternate but related data. 6. a conclusion rephrasing the thesis and explaining the relevancy of the source, that is, what you learned from this source and how it might be useful for your research essay. Discuss why you might (or might not) incorporate some of its claims and/or evidence into your own argument. 7. complete, correct, MLA 2016 Works Cited entries for all sources used in the paper. Evaluate a web source.

Detailed Instructions

 |

Do you need Assignment help from intel-writers.us?

intel-writers.us is one of the best essay help websites on the internet

Kindly click the link below to order quality essays from qualified assignment help experts

We offer well written, referenced and plagiarism free papers .

Click here to request for this assignment help